[jdom-interest] Re: Announce: JDOMPlus a flexible XML framework for
jhunter at collab.net
Fri Dec 15 18:21:38 PST 2000
Andy Heninger wrote:
> I'm sorry, but this sounds a bit like the pot calling the kettle
> black. I really think that if the name of this new JDOM-like thing
> is going to contain the string "DOM" at all, that it should include
> "JDOM", as it is clearly derived from and based on JDOM and has
> nothing at all in common with the standard DOM.
Any derivative with JDOM in the name violates the software license.
It's a simple issue, and James has already changed the name.
> As a quick intro, since I haven't posted here before, I work on
> xerces-c at IBM,
Glad to have you lurking (and now posting). But let me point out your
own license doesn't allow a Xerces fork to contain the name Xerces.
I'm sure if someone forked Xerces you'd enforce that license clause.
More information about the jdom-interest