[jdom-interest] Important proposal: Element/Document changes
James Duncan Davidson
duncan at x180.com
Wed Jul 26 13:45:18 PDT 2000
on 7/25/00 10:16 AM, Jason Hunter at jhunter at collab.net wrote:
> tsasala at hifusion.com wrote:
>> Two comments: is it possible to deprecate the methods instead
>> of removing them? We have application code that relies on JDOM, despite
>> the fact it is beta :).
> I personally would be OK with deprecating for one beta round to give you
> time to change. However, I'm firm there will be NO deprecated methods
> present in 1.0 final.
> Then the other method you propose would be addContentAt(). That's
> probably better as a Content form rather than Child form. Hmm, we'd
> need five forms again to cover all bases. What's the compelling common
> use case here?
And why aren't the collection based methods good enough for any of the use
>> I like the simplicity of getChildren/getChild over
>> getChildElement etc.
> OK. Others agree or disagree?
I'm cool with scrapping "Element" postfixes.
More information about the jdom-interest