[jdom-interest] UML overview of JDOM

Brett McLaughlin brett at newInstance.com
Mon Feb 19 09:50:10 PST 2001


What version of JDOM is it based on? I'd be willing to post the HTML docs
from Together J for the recent JDOM beta 6...

-Brett

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org
> [mailto:jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org]On Behalf Of Matthew MacKenzie
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:55 AM
> To: GB/DEV - Philip Nelson; jdom-interest at jdom.org
> Subject: RE: [jdom-interest] UML overview of JDOM
>
>
> I sent one to the list that I made by loading jdom into Together-J, but
> the moderator hasn't approved it because of the size.  If anyone wants the
> package, email me and I will send it.
>
>
> --
> Matthew MacKenzie
> VP Research & Development
> XML Global Technologies, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org
> [mailto:jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org]On Behalf Of GB/DEV - Philip Nelson
> Sent: February 19, 2001 7:45 AM
> To: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> Subject: RE: [jdom-interest] UML overview of JDOM
>
>
>
> > Is there a UML representation of JDOM?
>
> There was a very early UML diagram set made but none since.  Of course
> that's where reverse engineering comes into play...
>
> > I been reading the code and my intuition tells me that there
> > is some design
> > work to be done so usage can be simplyfied...
>
> All ideas are welcome, but a look through the mailing list archives could
> save you some effort.  There haven't been too many major structural issues
> that haven't been discussed heavily, especially if you are thinking about
> factories or builders.
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourh
> ost.com
>




More information about the jdom-interest mailing list