[jdom-interest] XPath & JDOM
ssmith at summitlogic.com
Thu Mar 1 15:22:08 PST 2001
On further examination, seems implementing Node implies implementing
Document which implies implementing basically everything. I guess it's
better just to extend Werken's work.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Smith [mailto:ssmith at summitlogic.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 5:27 PM
> To: 'jdom-interest at jdom.org'
> Subject: [jdom-interest] XPath & JDOM
> Please excuse me if this has already been discussed.
> The org.apache.xpath package was designed such that it could be used
> independently of Xalan. Seems like all we need to do to
> support XPath (and
> not have to worry about it's maintenance) is implement some interface
> classes to provide the apache.xpath classes with what they
> need to work.
> It might be as easy as having org.jdom.element implement the
> org.w3c.dom.node interface.
> Then we get complete XPath functionality for 'free'.
> PS: I know of Werken's XPath stuff. It is not complete. And
> it would seem
> more politically correct to use the Apache stuff anyway.
> Scott P. Smith
> 790 Oak Trail Drive
> Marietta, GA 30062
> email: ssmith at summitlogic.com
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
uraddr at yourhost.com
More information about the jdom-interest