[jdom-interest] First pass at Namespace revision[eg]

Jason Hunter jhunter at collab.net
Fri Mar 30 11:42:31 PST 2001

Jochen Strunk wrote:
> What was wrong with the use case in the first part of my mail (web
> framework) ? That's a real life example how we use jdom. It would really
> benefit from set namespace. It would also benefit from having support for
> default namespaces.

Here's the original use case, for the record:

We are using jdom in the context of a web framework. Different parts of
application deliver parts of an xml document. The framework then
these parts, assigning each a unique namespace to avoid conflicts.

Jochen, could you explain just a bit more on what you're doing?


More information about the jdom-interest mailing list