[jdom-interest] License File

William Krick wkrick at eio-online.com
Mon Jul 28 13:06:09 PDT 2003


My bad, I meant LICENSE.txt not README.txt

...
Krick



> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org
> [mailto:jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org]On Behalf Of Jason Hunter
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:47 PM
> To: William Krick
> Cc: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] License File
>
>
> Well, the README.txt isn't a license so I don't see why you'd call it
> jdom.license.  But including the README and license with the
> distribution sounds fine.
>
> -jh-
>
> William Krick wrote:
>
> > If I distribute the jdom.jar as-is (unmodified) with my
> application, is it
> > sufficient for me to include the jdom README.txt renamed to
> "jdom.license"
> > in the directory with the jar file?  Or do I need to do
> something else as
> > well?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org
> >>[mailto:jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org]On Behalf Of Jason Hunter
> >>Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:58 PM
> >>To: John Jefferson
> >>Cc: jdom
> >>Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] License File
> >>
> >>
> >>That's what we do with other people's JARs, as you see in lib.
> >>
> >>-jh-
> >>
> >>John Jefferson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi Jason,
> >>>
> >>>Fair enough, in the case where I am distributing your
> >>>binary unmodified I should then extract the license
> >>>file from that binary and put it in the same directory
> >>>as the binary?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>JJ
> >>>
> >>>--- Jason Hunter <jhunter at servlets.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I don't see that as sufficient.  A JAR is not
> >>>>generally expanded in its
> >>>>normal use, thus the file remains hidden when it
> >>>>should be quite obvious.
> >>>>
> >>>>-jh-
> >>>>
> >>>>John Jefferson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi Jason
> >>>>>
> >>>>>If I am distributing the source compiled into a
> >>>>
> >>>>jar,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>is it enough to just put the license file inside
> >>>>
> >>>>the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>jar as well?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>JJ
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--- Jason Hunter <jhunter at servlets.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Well we don't ship a version without the build.xml
> >>>>>>file.  We could put
> >>>>>>build.xml in the JAR but that just doesn't seem
> >>>>
> >>>>very
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>elegant.  Besides
> >>>>>>you shouldn't distribute just the JAR since you
> >>>>
> >>>>need
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>to copy over at
> >>>>>>least the license.  :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-jh-
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>__________________________________
> >>>>>Do you Yahoo!?
> >>>>>The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> >>>>>http://search.yahoo.com
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>To control your jdom-interest membership:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/yourad
> >
> > dr at yourhost.com
> >
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>To control your jdom-interest membership:
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
> t.com
>
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
>>http://search.yahoo.com
>>_______________________________________________
>>To control your jdom-interest membership:
>>
>
>
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
> t.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
>
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
> t.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
>
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
t.com
>

_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
t.com




More information about the jdom-interest mailing list