[jdom-interest] SAXOutputter

[Chris B.]

Bradley S. Huffman wrote:

>"Chris B." writes:
>
>  
>
>>I'm talking about a proper solution, not a hack.
>>    
>>
>
>More like a fringe case that's on the wrong side of the 80/20 rule.
>  
>

I don't see what's fringe about it at all.

But if the necessary methods were at least protected rather than 
private, at least it could be worked around without jumping through hoops.

>I'd go for a output(Element) since a single element is a well-formed
>document, but it still would call startDocument.
>  
>

How is it going to help me if it still calls startDocument?