[jdom-interest] Re: [jaxen-dev] Time for Beta 5? and then 1.1?
jhunter at xquery.com
Thu Apr 14 15:53:17 PDT 2005
Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Bob McWhirter wrote:
>> btw, I think JDOM already has taken their navigator. If not, Jason
>> Hunter has implied at least that it'd be a good idea to move it to the
>> JDOM codebase. Ideally, only the navigators w/o a host (ie, the
>> JavaBeanNavigator && DOMNavigator) should be in jaxen, and even then
>> in secondary jars.
> Looking at JDOM's CVS, they seem to have their own Jaxen XPath class but
> I don't think they have their own navigator. Let me cc this message to
> jdom-interest, and see what they think.
> JDOM folks, does JDOM 1.0 need the org.jaxen.jdom package in Jaxen? If
> it does require that, would it be possible to pull those classes out of
> Jaxen and move them into the JDOM code base?
Either way is fine with me.
Since JDOM ships Jaxen, we will just do a new release that keeps
everything in sync. Fortunately people using JDOM don't ever see the
org.jaxen.jdom package, so this is really a private implementation detail.
More information about the jdom-interest