[jdom-interest] Re: [jaxen-dev] Time for Beta 5? and then 1.1?

Jason Hunter jhunter at xquery.com
Thu Apr 14 15:53:17 PDT 2005

Elliotte Harold wrote:

> Bob McWhirter wrote:
>> btw, I think JDOM already has taken their navigator.  If not, Jason 
>> Hunter has implied at least that it'd be a good idea to move it to the 
>> JDOM codebase.   Ideally, only the navigators w/o a host (ie, the 
>> JavaBeanNavigator && DOMNavigator) should be in jaxen, and even then 
>> in secondary jars.
> Looking at JDOM's CVS, they seem to have their own Jaxen XPath class but 
> I don't think they have their own navigator. Let me cc this message to 
> jdom-interest, and see what they think.
> JDOM folks, does JDOM 1.0 need the org.jaxen.jdom package in Jaxen? If 
> it does require that, would it be possible to pull those classes out of 
> Jaxen and move them into the JDOM code base?

Either way is fine with me.

Since JDOM ships Jaxen, we will just do a new release that keeps 
everything in sync.  Fortunately people using JDOM don't ever see the 
org.jaxen.jdom package, so this is really a private implementation detail.


More information about the jdom-interest mailing list