FW: [jdom-interest] & in namespace
jhunter at xquery.com
Wed May 3 09:43:49 PDT 2006
Bradley S. Huffman wrote:
> "Deshpande, Aniruddha" writes:
>> What do you feel? Is this a bug in JDOM? How should we proceed?
> You look at the code to see what's going on, and if needed make a patch
> like this. Brad
> *** XMLOutputter.java Fri Dec 10 19:31:50 2004
> --- XMLOutputter.new Wed May 3 09:03:19 2006
> *** 1118,1124 ****
> ! out.write(uri);
> --- 1118,1124 ----
> ! out.write(escapeAttributeEntities(uri));
Bingo. Anyone see a reason this wouldn't be spec conformant?
BTW, JDOM's not dead. I'm still engaged, just need to get off my duff
and do a 1.0.1 with the few small bugs we fixed since 1.0. There hasn't
been much interest expressed in a 1.1 release. JDOM already does
everything *I* care about. Are there things people want in a 1.1 or
2.0, or should we stay in happy maintenance mode.
More information about the jdom-interest