<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>Just because you do not see value does not mean there is no value.</span></div><div><br></div><div>Number one reason for adding support is interoperability, meaning that there is often need to convert between streaming/incremental APIs and tree model.</div><br><span></span><div><span>-+ Tatu +-</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><br></div><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><font face="Arial" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Rolf <jdom@tuis.net><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> jdom
<jdom-interest@jdom.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Monday, November 14, 2011 5:02 AM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [jdom-interest] StAX support<br></font><br>
I agree with Michael. There's no gain in supporting StAX. I would<br>invest time or resources into it.<br><br>-- <br>Elliotte Rusty Harold<br><a ymailto="mailto:elharo@ibiblio.org" href="mailto:elharo@ibiblio.org">elharo@ibiblio.org</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>To control your jdom-interest membership:<br>http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com<br><br><br></div></div></div></body></html>