sclark at e-numerate.com
Tue Sep 5 07:26:36 PDT 2000
I looked at the XML file that is the basis for building with Ant (I have
not been familiar with Ant, though clearly that must change :-) and of
course using "build javadoc" is the correct solution. Since several people
had asked about javadoc, and no one had mentioned that the XML file
supported this build, I assumed that the build file didn't support javadoc
and we had to "roll our own." Sorry to have wasted everyone's time.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Hunter [mailto:jhunter at collab.net]
> Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 10:50 PM
> To: sclark at e-numerate.com; jdom interest
> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Javadocs
> > I realize that the official project JavaDocs will not be
> built until
> > beta5. Rather, I was suggesting that some users might prefer to
> > build their own Javadocs in the interim.
> What's wrong with "build javadoc"? It's a standard build target we've
> had since the beginning.
More information about the jdom-interest