[jdom-interest] META: Children of a lesser spec
jhunter at collab.net
Fri Sep 29 17:47:44 PDT 2000
> Jason, I completely agree with your reasoning in this message. I even
> feel (strongly) that getChild() is better than getChildElement().
OK, so I have a +1 if I can get rid of the third party candidate. :-)
> But why do you refuse to acknowledge the third option, getElement()?
Because I don't like elt.getElement("foo").getElement("bar"). It's too
ambiguous. I wouldn't like str.getString() either, or obj.getObject().
> This project needs a third-party candidate! For too long we have
> suffered with the false choice between Brettocrats and Huntericans.
Go Nader, eh?
> OK, back to taking a nap.
You need a job, Alex. Barring that, we need you to do more JDOM work!
Keep up with the patches! :-)
More information about the jdom-interest