[jdom-interest] JDOM 1.1.1 release candidate
bcox at virtualschool.edu
Thu Jul 23 07:04:05 PDT 2009
> From: Brad Cox <bradjcox at gmail.com>
> Date: July 23, 2009 7:52:35 AM EDT
> To: Jason Hunter <jhunter at servlets.com>
> Cc: jdom interest <jdom-interest at jdom.org>, jdom-announce at jdom.org,
> Scott Emmons <lscotte at gmail.com>, Bob McWhirter <bob at werken.com>
> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] JDOM 1.1.1 release candidate
> Jason, FYI the reason I stopped using JDOM after years of satisfied
> use was inability to make it coexist with OSGI. As I recall, the
> problem was trivial; 2-3 classes in the default namespace which
> gives OSGI fits. Been awhile since I've looked tho.
> On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:52 AM, Jason Hunter wrote:
>> I just posted a release candidate for JDOM 1.1.1. I'd appreciate
>> people giving it a test to confirm there's nothing problematic
>> about this, before I make it an official release. I'd especially
>> like your review if you're (a) an expert on surrogate pairs, (b)
>> use a lot of XPath, (c) have deployments on JDK 1.2/1.3/1.4, or (d)
>> really push the speed of XMLOutputter and can confirm the surrogate
>> pair work hasn't slowed you down noticeably. Email me privately
>> with reports of success, or publicly on jdom-interest with any
>> Here's what's new:
>> Fixed a synchronization issue in the Namespace class that could
>> cause a
>> hang when doing concurrent builds.
>> Added output support for Unicode surrogate pairs.
>> Added a new flag on SAXBuilder named setFastReconfigure() which,
>> when set,
>> can speed reconfiguration by skipping repeated attempts to set
>> features that
>> are determined not to be present on a parser. Useful when doing
>> many builds
>> per second.
>> Updated the provided Jaxen library from a modified Jaxen 1.0 to the
>> which is Jaxen 1.1.1.
>> Added reflection code in the error reporting system to support
>> Dalvik VM which doesn't have the java.rmi.* classes.
>> To control your jdom-interest membership:
More information about the jdom-interest