[jdom-interest] suggested JDOM2 improvements

Leigh L Klotz Jr leigh.klotz at xerox.com
Fri Jan 20 16:44:12 PST 2012

No problem, I understand now.
BTW I've decided my desire to replace the XPath factory to work around a 
Jaxen bug is in fact a problem with Jaxen instead; it's just that I have 
no belief I can get the Jaxen bug fixed ever.

Since you're re-working the XPath class I'll hold off on any more 
uninformed comments...


On 01/20/2012 03:19 PM, Rolf Lear wrote:
> Hi Leigh
> I think we are both missing something here.
> In JDOM2 I'm convinced that XPath is deprecated... so, while it is still
> in the ALPHA at the moment it will have a viable replacement by the next
> We'll make sure the replacement is 'good' for custom/other XPath backend
> implementations.
> Give me a day to polish up a proposed replacement. I think you are
> missing the tricks of the XPathFactory code in the current ALPHA
> release, but there's not much point in fighting it when it is going to
> change anyway.
> Rolf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.jdom.org/pipermail/jdom-interest/attachments/20120120/e16f39f4/attachment.html>

More information about the jdom-interest mailing list